"Mama, these barrettes are for babies. So we should give them to Joey!" suggested Clara, oh-so-helpfully the other day.
Squashing her helpfulness, I responded, "Nope, Joey's a boy. He doesn't wear barrettes."
Man, oh, man--not even 10 months old and I'm limiting him. I hate saying stuff like that. But, what else should I do?
I didn't have this issue with Clara, because in the cultures that we live in, girls are pretty well liberated. It's OK and even encouraged for her to wear shorts and pants. Keep in mind, 100 years ago, that would not have been acceptable to society at large.
Just like "Joey's barrettes" are not at all acceptable in today's society, in general.
Even more telling, Clara's favorite book right now is
He Bear and She Bear, by Stan and Jan Berenstain. It's a great book that celebrates the fact that boys and girls (men and women) can do any kind of job, showing female bears driving bulldozers and male bears knitting socks. (They also show male bears working construction and female bears sewing dresses.) As a kid I loved that book and I'm so glad that Clara is getting attached to it.
But no matter how much I believe the message in that book, I won't be putting barrettes in my son's hair.

Now, if it were Joe asking me to put the barrettes in his hair, that's a different story. I'd let him, at least while we're in the house. Dressing up is an important part of a child's development, and I won't limit that in any way (at least while we're in our own house). As another example, when I worked with two-year-olds at a daycare center, I took care of one little boy, who was small for his age, but nevertheless walked around like a linebacker. He kind of acted like a linebacker, too (if linebackers have a certain way of acting). But man-oh-man did that kid LOVE the high heels in our dress-up chest. He'd strut around all afternoon in those high heels, looking so proud of himself. I thought he was the most adorable guy ever and made the mistake of telling his father about the shoe obsession. Dad freaked out.
This boy's dad failed to think about all the important things his son was learning while wearing those heels. First, and I think the driving factor for this boy wearing the heels is simply the fact that they're fun. Keep in mind that two-year-olds have just mastered the act of walking. High heels take that achievement and kick it up a notch. And this little guy got to be an inch taller--awesome! Furthermore, little kids trying on "typical" clothing from the opposite gender is learning that, although I may wear heels and a dress like Mom, I'm still me, and a boy (if the child in question is a boy). The feathers do not change the gender. That's a pretty big lesson for little people to get. So thank goodness lots of little kids are permitted to test these theories with the clothes found in dress-up trunks and discover for themselves that, "yep, I'm still me, even if I'm wearing a dress (or a tie)".
I'm glad that most of my gender-limitation angst is limited to clothing (and hair accessories). Boys, who grow into men, are generally able to pursue and hobby and career that piques their interest. And I rejoice that we live in this century and this area of the world, so my daughter also has very few limitations placed on her.
But at this point in his development, I feel that it's my son who has more cultural limitations placed on him, thanks to his gender.
How weird is that?
Furthermore, what do we do about it?